head to head
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter asks more than Red Dead Redemption 2, and the gap is reads.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Planning approaches with recon tools, then executing them under lethal fire.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Lethal firefights punish sloppy aim and exposure
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter leans clearly harder on reads.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Multiplayer squads outflank and adapt to your habits
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Enemy placements are scripted-but-unknown on first attempt
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter leans clearly harder on optimization.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Drone recon, squad orders and approach planning decide missions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.