head to head
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier asks more than Red Dead Redemption 2, and the gap is reads.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Tactical shooter precision built around planned approaches and synchronised takedowns.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Sync-shot timing and cover gunplay reward precision
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier leans clearly harder on reads.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Multiplayer flanks involve humans; campaign AI is scripted
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Encounters are designed set pieces
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Gunsmith loadouts and approach planning are the tactical layer
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.