head to head
X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse asks more than Red Dead Redemption 2, and the gap is optimization.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A team-based Marvel ARPG where squad building and skill point allocation beat raw reflexes.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse
Brawling and power timing are light demands.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse
Scripted mutant enemies, no adaptation.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse
Minor loot randomness in equipment drops.
X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse leans clearly harder on optimization.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse
Team composition and skill allocation carry the campaign.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.