head to head
Total War: Warhammer II asks more than Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun, and the gap is reads.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Precisely timing simultaneous character actions to execute optimal stealth routes through fixed guard patterns.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Optimizing race mechanics and vortex rituals while executing real-time battle tactics.
Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Total War: Warhammer II leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun
Precise timing windows on simultaneous multi-character abilities matter
Total War: Warhammer II
Unit micro, spell timing, and formation play drive battle outcomes
Total War: Warhammer II leans clearly harder on reads.
Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun
Guard patrol routes are fixed; no opponent models you
Total War: Warhammer II
Vortex campaign AI predictable; human opponents require genuine reads
Total War: Warhammer II leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun
Guard cone randomness is minimal once patterns are learned
Total War: Warhammer II
Rite costs, random loot drops, and chaos invasion timing create variance
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun
Route planning and ability combo sequencing reduce to near-perfect solutions
Total War: Warhammer II
Race mechanics and vortex ritual routing are richly optimizable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.