head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Executing memorised high-speed routes through deterministic platforming levels.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
The notoriously demanding side-scrolling Zelda built on tight sword duels and RPG levelling.
Sonic Generations leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Zelda II: The Adventure of Link leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Sonic Generations
Holding speed through precise jumps and boosts is the test
Zelda II: The Adventure of Link
Precise sword spacing, shield stabs, brutal platforming
Zelda II: The Adventure of Link leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Sonic Generations
No opponent; bosses are fixed patterns
Zelda II: The Adventure of Link
Ironknuckles feint but follow fixed logic
Zelda II: The Adventure of Link leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Sonic Generations
Levels are fully deterministic
Zelda II: The Adventure of Link
Layouts fixed, little hidden randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Sonic Generations
S-ranks come from memorising optimal routes and shortcuts
Zelda II: The Adventure of Link
XP routing, spell use, palace order planning
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.