head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
The N64 original that turned Nintendo mascots into a percent-and-knockback platform fighter.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A competitive party platformer where placing obstacles to block others while surviving your own traps tests both execution and social prediction.
Super Smash Bros. leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Ultimate Chicken Horse leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Super Smash Bros.
Z-cancels and DI demand fast precise inputs despite simple controls.
Ultimate Chicken Horse
Precise platforming through player-built obstacle courses is the ceiling
Super Smash Bros. leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Super Smash Bros.
Edgeguard and tech-chase guessing against adapting humans decides stocks.
Ultimate Chicken Horse
Predicting what obstacles opponents will place is genuine social reads
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Super Smash Bros.
Item spawns add randomness; tournament rules strip most of it.
Ultimate Chicken Horse
Block placement creates novel layouts each round
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Super Smash Bros.
Stage positioning and percent-based kill setups are learnable.
Ultimate Chicken Horse
Optimal obstacle placement strategies are learnable over sessions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.