head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A tactical cover shooter where build crafting and teamwork meet real PvP reads in contested Dark Zone spaces.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Planning tactical approaches and executing careful shots where mistakes are lethal.
The Division 2 leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
The Division 2
Cover shooting and positioning demand consistent aim under pressure
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2
Accurate shooting under lethal fire still decides firefights
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
The Division 2
Dark Zone and conflict PvP feature real adaptive opponents
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2
Multiplayer rewards predicting human positioning; campaign AI is scripted
The Division 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
The Division 2
Named item drops and talent rolls add meaningful RNG
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2
Unknown enemy placements punish first attempts
The Division 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
The Division 2
Skill builds and gear set synergies are extensively theory-crafted
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2
Squad orders, drone recon and approach planning carry the campaign
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.