head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Light / Casual
A narrative walking-mystery game focused on environmental storytelling and deduction.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A heartfelt WWI puzzle adventure following four lives through the trenches.
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter Redux leans Optimization (Light / Casual); Valiant Hearts: The Great War leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter Redux
minimal input, mostly walking and observing
Valiant Hearts: The Great War
Gentle timing in a few chase sequences
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter Redux leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter Redux
no adversarial opponent, narrative mystery
Valiant Hearts: The Great War
No opponent
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter Redux
fixed clues, no meaningful randomness
Valiant Hearts: The Great War
Fixed puzzles, fully visible
Valiant Hearts: The Great War leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
The Vanishing of Ethan Carter Redux
deduction puzzle-solving is the systems layer
Valiant Hearts: The Great War
Simple inventory and environmental puzzles with set solutions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.