head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A competitive party platformer where placing obstacles to block others while surviving your own traps tests both execution and social prediction.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Real-time arena aim duels against human worms with randomised weapon pickups.
Ultimate Chicken Horse leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Worms Rumble leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Ultimate Chicken Horse
Precise platforming through player-built obstacle courses is the ceiling
Worms Rumble
Real-time aim and movement decide brawls, unlike turn-based Worms
Ultimate Chicken Horse leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Ultimate Chicken Horse
Predicting what obstacles opponents will place is genuine social reads
Worms Rumble
Human opponents in arena and royale modes can be predicted
Worms Rumble leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Ultimate Chicken Horse
Block placement creates novel layouts each round
Worms Rumble
Weapon crate spawns and drop positions add randomness
Ultimate Chicken Horse leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Ultimate Chicken Horse
Optimal obstacle placement strategies are learnable over sessions
Worms Rumble
Loadout knowledge and map control matter but stay shallow
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.