Opus Magnum cover art

Opus Magnum

An alchemical machine-building puzzle where the real game is optimizing cost, cycles, and area.

On Steam ↗
Here's the argument for where this game sits - disagree freely.
Match your experience?
EXECUTION2 /10READS0 /10VARIANCE0 /10OPTIMIZATION9 /10

the cheat-test profile

The four axes - the argument

Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.

  1. Execution

    cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs

    2/10

    Placing and timing alchemical arms has minor dexterity demand

  2. Reads

    cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent

    0/10

    No opponent; solo construction puzzle

  3. Variance

    cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG

    0/10

    Transmutation puzzles are deterministic with fixed inputs

  4. Optimization

    cheat: A perfect solver / coach

    9/10

    Engineering compact efficient alchemical machines to produce target molecules

How to read this

Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.

These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.

The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.

Game details

Released
2017
Developer
Zachtronics
Platforms
Linux, PC, Mac, XONE
Modes
Single player
IGDB critics
92/100
IGDB users
86/100
PuzzleSimulatorIndieFantasyScience fictionSandbox