Gamorium's take

Mobile production-chain and layout optimisation paced by timers.
the cheat-test profile
Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.
cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs
Tapping menus has no skill floor
cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent
No adversary; trade is asynchronous
cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG
Market prices and material drops add mild randomness
cheat: A perfect solver / coach
Production chains, layout and currency timing are the whole game
Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.
These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.
The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.
Ranked by shared genre first, then by how closely the cheat-test profile matches - a cross-genre tag means a pick matched on skill profile alone.

Zero Escape: Zero Time Dilemma
Pure Optimization · mystery escape room

Dragon Quest VIII: Journey of the Cursed King
Pure Optimization · turn-based JRPG