Gamorium's take

Mapping a branching-fable decision tree with light combat between choices.
the cheat-test profile
Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.
cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs
Counter-based combat is forgiving Arkham-style timing
cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent
Enemies telegraph from fixed scripts
cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG
Branch outcomes are hidden until a path is tried
cheat: A perfect solver / coach
Mapping choice combinations to find the true ending is the game
Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.
These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.
The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.
Ranked by shared genre first, then by how closely the cheat-test profile matches - a cross-genre tag means a pick matched on skill profile alone.

The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings - Enhanced Edition
Practiced Mastery · action RPG

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle
Practiced Mastery · first-person adventure