Gamorium's take

A test of precise inputs and constant human prediction across a fixed roster of matchup puzzles.
the cheat-test profile
Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.
cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs
Frame-precise inputs and combo timing define every matchup
cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent
Predicting human opponent's next move is constant and non-convergent
cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG
No meaningful RNG; match outcomes are skill-determined
cheat: A perfect solver / coach
Character matchups and punish routes are learnable but not fully solvable
Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.
These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.
The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.
Ranked by shared genre first, then by how closely the cheat-test profile matches - a cross-genre tag means a pick matched on skill profile alone.

Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes
Grand Arena · tag fighting game