Gamorium's take

Learning scripted mission layouts and executing aim and stealth under pressure.
the cheat-test profile
Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.
cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs
Aim, taser timing and stealth movement carry encounters
cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent
Enemies run fixed scripts, never model the player
cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG
Enemy placements are scripted-but-unknown on first runs
cheat: A perfect solver / coach
Routes, gadget use and mission layouts are fully learnable
Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.
These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.
The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.
Ranked by shared genre first, then by how closely the cheat-test profile matches - a cross-genre tag means a pick matched on skill profile alone.

Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Conviction
Practiced Mastery · stealth action

The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay
Practiced Mastery · stealth action FPS

Star Wars Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II
Practiced Mastery · action FPS