Gamorium's take

Logical item-and-spell puzzle chains inside a fixed two-protagonist fantasy story.
the cheat-test profile
Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.
cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs
Clicking hotspots has no dexterity component
cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent
Story beats are authored, nothing adapts to you
cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG
Puzzle solutions are hidden until experimentation reveals them
cheat: A perfect solver / coach
Combining items and spells logically is the entire test
Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.
These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.
The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.
Ranked by shared genre first, then by how closely the cheat-test profile matches - a cross-genre tag means a pick matched on skill profile alone.

Danganronpa: Trigger Happy Havoc
Pure Optimization · murder mystery VN

The Curse of Monkey Island
Pure Optimization · point-and-click adventure

Danganronpa V3: Killing Harmony
Pure Optimization · murder mystery VN