Gamorium's take

A physics puzzle-platformer about swapping three heroes to improvise solutions.
the cheat-test profile
Each axis is rated on its own - how far one cheat would trivialize the game here. They don't trade off; low on all four means the game is an experience, not a contest.
cheat: Aimbot - perfect inputs
Physics platforming and wizard-box stacking need dexterity
cheat: Out-predict an adaptive opponent
No opponent; puzzles are fixed
cheat: See what's hidden / map the RNG
Levels are static and fully visible
cheat: A perfect solver / coach
Choosing the right hero and contraption solves each obstacle
Each axis is named by the cheat that would break the game along it. Execution is the hands. Reads is out-thinking an adaptive opponent. Variance is hidden information & RNG. Optimization is the solvable systems layer. A game's region is the top one or two axes.
These four aren't one rating split four ways - they're independent 0-10 questions. A 9 on one axis takes nothing from the others, and a game low on all four isn't missing data: it's telling you there's no skill here to cheat.
The basis is how the majority actually plays this game - not a niche mode or a personal run. For a game with very different modes (a story campaign versus ranked multiplayer), that's the version most people mean.
Ranked by shared genre first, then by how closely the cheat-test profile matches - a cross-genre tag means a pick matched on skill profile alone.

Castlevania: Harmony of Dissonance
Pure Optimization · metroidvania

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time
Practiced Mastery · acrobatic platformer