Blazing Angels: Squadrons of WWII

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: variance (1 vs 2) - Minor physics wobble and CPU behaviour randomness

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: variance (1 vs 2) - Slight physics and CPU pattern randomness

Both lean on variance about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Cornering and throttle control decide every race

Both lean on reads about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Car control through corners is the entire moment-to-moment test

Both lean on reads about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Aggressive wheel-to-wheel car control is the core demand

Both lean on variance about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Racing lines, braking points and car control lead everything

Both lean on reads about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Tight dogfighting and missile-dodge timing

Both lean on reads about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 7) - Sliding off-road cars on mixed surfaces is the whole test

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Otherwise the profiles match closely.

Both lean on reads about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 5) - Driving and shooting demand decent inputs.

Both lean on execution about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 1) - Combine AI scripted, non-adaptive.

Both lean on variance about the same (1 vs 1). Biggest difference: execution (6 vs 5) - Skyline traversal and aiming reward inputs.