King's Quest IV: The Perils of Rosella

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (3 vs 2) - Investigation choices partially obscure which evidence matters

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Class trial rhythm sections add minor timing layer

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Side-scrolling adventure controls require no dexterity

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Pointing and walking only

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Exploration is gentle; no motor challenge anywhere

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Timed vote prompts create mild urgency but no skill ceiling

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Rotating and prodding mechanisms takes no dexterity

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Pointing and clicking has no dexterity component

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Pointing and clicking carries no physical demand

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: optimization (6 vs 7) - Puzzles have single fixed solutions; walkthrough trivializes

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - Point-and-click pacing has zero dexterity demands

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Otherwise the profiles match closely.