Microsoft Train Simulator

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - no physical skill ceiling at all

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 3) - Simplified combat rarely punishes

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Minor resource RNG.

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Mostly fixed obstacles, minor unknowns first run

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 3) - Aim and sweep nozzle precision

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Light job variety

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Job orders vary slightly day to day.

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: optimization (6 vs 7) - Understanding forced-perspective growth rules to size objects into the correct shape

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Stud and brick locations fixed

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (2 vs 1) - One bullet-dodge finale aside, no dexterity

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - Linear story with fixed world states

Both lean on execution about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: variance (0 vs 1) - No randomness.