Professor Layton and the Diabolical Box

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (0 vs 1) - Walking and clicking; zero reflex demand

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (0 vs 1) - New Debate Scrum and other trial modes add mild timing

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (0 vs 1) - Point-and-click with no timing elements

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (0 vs 1) - Pure point-and-click with no time pressure

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (0 vs 1) - Touchscreen-friendly design demands zero physical precision

Both lean on execution about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: variance (1 vs 2) - Solutions unknown on first encounter only

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (0 vs 1) - One bullet-dodge finale aside, no dexterity

Both lean on execution about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: variance (1 vs 2) - Perceive system hides tells until the player scans testimony

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (0 vs 1) - Classic SCUMM-style interface with no twitch elements

Both lean on execution about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: variance (1 vs 2) - Puzzle solutions are hidden until found

Both lean on reads about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: execution (0 vs 1) - Same interface as original; zero reflex component

Both lean on execution about the same (0 vs 0). Biggest difference: variance (1 vs 2) - First-run puzzle surprises only