Scooby-Doo Mystery

Both lean on execution about the same (3 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 2) - Action sequences use basic QTE with low penalty for failure

Both lean on execution about the same (3 vs 4). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 4) - Document-checking speed directly pays the rent

Both lean on optimization about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 1) - Class trial rhythm sections add minor timing layer

Both lean on execution about the same (3 vs 3). Biggest difference: variance (3 vs 1) - Minimal randomness; world state is tightly authored

Both lean on optimization about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 1) - Side-scrolling adventure controls require no dexterity

Both lean on optimization about the same (6 vs 6). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 1) - Pointing and walking only

Both lean on variance about the same (3 vs 3). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 1) - Exploration is gentle; no motor challenge anywhere

Both lean on variance about the same (3 vs 3). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 1) - Timed vote prompts create mild urgency but no skill ceiling

Both lean on variance about the same (3 vs 3). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 1) - Rotating and prodding mechanisms takes no dexterity

Both lean on variance about the same (3 vs 3). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 1) - Pointing and clicking has no dexterity component

Both lean on variance about the same (3 vs 3). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 2) - Light cover-shooting sections need minimal timing

Both lean on variance about the same (3 vs 3). Biggest difference: execution (3 vs 1) - Pointing and clicking carries no physical demand