Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 3) - Multiplayer duels reward reading humans

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 3) - Light multiplayer prediction; campaign AI is scripted

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 1) - Enemies scripted in arena waves.

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 1) - Scripted Ceph and soldiers follow fixed patterns

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 3) - historic multiplayer scene rewarded outguessing humans

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 1) - Enemy squads are clever but scripted

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: variance (2 vs 1) - Deterministic encounters

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 1) - Combine and headcrabs scripted.

Both lean on reads about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (7 vs 6) - Standard shooter gunplay carries the campaign

Both lean on variance about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (7 vs 6) - Aimbot would trivialise the gunfights and showdown duels

Both lean on reads about the same (2 vs 2). Biggest difference: execution (7 vs 6) - aim and melee timing across species

Both lean on execution about the same (7 vs 7). Biggest difference: reads (2 vs 3) - Multiplayer and clever sims add some human-style adaptation