head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
A classic side-scrolling platformer following Aladdin through Agrabah and beyond.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
A frantic endless runner with retro arcade style.
Aladdin leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Geki Yaba Runner: Anniversary Edition leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Aladdin
Precise platforming jumps and sword-timing are demanding.
Geki Yaba Runner: Anniversary Edition
fast reflex timing for endless running
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Aladdin
No adaptive opponent, fixed enemy patterns.
Geki Yaba Runner: Anniversary Edition
no opponent, solo endless runner
Geki Yaba Runner: Anniversary Edition leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Aladdin
Some randomness in enemy placement and drops.
Geki Yaba Runner: Anniversary Edition
procedural obstacle generation
Aladdin leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Aladdin
Level routes are learnable but execution dominates.
Geki Yaba Runner: Anniversary Edition
minor route/upgrade optimization
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.