head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Slingshot trajectory puzzles with randomised bird hands gating consistency.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Action RPG prequel to FFVII whose combat spins a slot machine for buffs.
Angry Birds 2 leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Angry Birds 2
Trajectory precision on the slingshot matters modestly
Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII
real-time dodging and attack timing
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Angry Birds 2
Pigs sit in structures, never adapting
Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII
no adaptive opponent
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Angry Birds 2
Random bird-card hands and multi-stage levels shuffle each attempt
Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII
DMW slot reels randomize limit breaks and levels
Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Angry Birds 2
Knowing structure weak points and bird matchups is the edge
Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII
materia fusion is a deep solvable system
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.