head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A dinosaur survival game about taming, building, and tribal warfare on a hostile island.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A turn-based tactics game about positioning and managing action economy.
ARK: Survival Evolved leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Narcos: Rise of the Cartels leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
ARK: Survival Evolved leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
ARK: Survival Evolved
Shooting and kiting matter in raids
Narcos: Rise of the Cartels
Overwatch-style shots involve light aiming, not twitch
ARK: Survival Evolved leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
ARK: Survival Evolved
Tribe warfare involves human deception and politics
Narcos: Rise of the Cartels
AI enemies follow scripted tactics, not adaptive
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
ARK: Survival Evolved
Taming rolls, spawns, and surprise raids
Narcos: Rise of the Cartels
Hit chances and enemy actions add randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
ARK: Survival Evolved
Breeding lines, base design, and farming dominate
Narcos: Rise of the Cartels
Positioning and action-economy planning win battles
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.