head to head
Baldur's Gate 3 asks more than Detective Pikachu, and the gap is optimization.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A D&D CRPG where build optimization and dice variance dominate every encounter.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A kid-friendly mystery adventure testing light deduction over scripted cases.
Baldur's Gate 3 leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos); Detective Pikachu leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Baldur's Gate 3
Turn-based; no input dexterity.
Detective Pikachu
Tapping through investigation scenes asks nothing
Baldur's Gate 3 leans clearly harder on reads.
Baldur's Gate 3
Companions/enemies scripted, not adaptive to player modeling.
Detective Pikachu
Witnesses are scripted, never adapting to you
Baldur's Gate 3 leans clearly harder on variance.
Baldur's Gate 3
Dice rolls, hidden checks, encounter RNG everywhere.
Detective Pikachu
Case facts are hidden until testimony reveals them
Baldur's Gate 3 leans clearly harder on optimization.
Baldur's Gate 3
Builds, party comp, action economy fully solvable.
Detective Pikachu
Assembling clues into conclusions is gentle fixed logic
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.