head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
Frame-precise rhythm-platforming execution on fully deterministic tracks.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
A demanding return to classic Crash platforming.
Bit.Trip Presents... Runner2: Future Legend of Rhythm Alien leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Bit.Trip Presents... Runner2: Future Legend of Rhythm Alien
Frame-tight rhythm inputs on fixed tracks are everything
Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time
Brutal platforming with precise crate timing
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Bit.Trip Presents... Runner2: Future Legend of Rhythm Alien
No opponent; the track never adapts
Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time
Scripted bosses
Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Bit.Trip Presents... Runner2: Future Legend of Rhythm Alien
Levels are fully deterministic
Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time
Deterministic levels
Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Bit.Trip Presents... Runner2: Future Legend of Rhythm Alien
Memorising layouts helps but execution still gates clears
Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time
N. Verted and flashback routing
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Bit.Trip Presents... Runner2: Future Legend of Rhythm Alien →
full breakdown
Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time →