head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
Arcade hockey reflexes with light shot-angle guessing against human opponents.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
WWII shooter remembered for its Omaha Beach landing and tense rifle duels.
Blades of Steel leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Medal of Honor: Allied Assault leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Blades of Steel
Skating, passing and shot timing decide every rush
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
classic FPS aim, leaning, and sniping
Blades of Steel leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Blades of Steel
Versus a human, goalie duels become guessing games
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
historic multiplayer scene rewarded outguessing humans
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Blades of Steel
Fights and bounces add small arcade chaos
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
scripted ambushes surprise only once
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Blades of Steel
Angle exploits on the goalie are quickly mapped
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
encounter memorization, especially Omaha Beach
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.