head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Turn-based RPG whose reactive parry timing layers execution onto build optimization.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Choosing augmentation paths and routing through hubs to neutralise scripted opposition with minimal friction.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Deus Ex: Human Revolution leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
Parry and dodge timing inside turn-based combat
Deus Ex: Human Revolution
Combat demands moderate aim; takedowns are execution-gated
Deus Ex: Human Revolution leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
Bosses follow learnable scripted patterns
Deus Ex: Human Revolution
Guards use scripted alert states, not player-adaptive logic
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
Some unknown attack strings on first encounter
Deus Ex: Human Revolution
Enemy positions are static once patrol patterns are learned
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
Pictos, builds, and turn economy are solvable
Deus Ex: Human Revolution
Augment loadout and approach routing solve each hub optimally
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.