head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
FPS aim welded to a team economy of base-destruction priorities.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
WWII shooter remembered for its Omaha Beach landing and tense rifle duels.
Command & Conquer: Renegade leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Medal of Honor: Allied Assault leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Command & Conquer: Renegade
FPS aim in infantry and vehicle fights carries the game
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
classic FPS aim, leaning, and sniping
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Command & Conquer: Renegade
Multiplayer base assaults involve predicting human team pushes
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
historic multiplayer scene rewarded outguessing humans
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Command & Conquer: Renegade
Maps and economy rules are fully known
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
scripted ambushes surprise only once
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Command & Conquer: Renegade
Credit economy and building-target priority decide C&C-mode matches
Medal of Honor: Allied Assault
encounter memorization, especially Omaha Beach
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.