head to head
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive asks more than Pro Evolution Soccer 2011 3D, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A football simulation testing ball control, tactics and reading opponents.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Pro Evolution Soccer 2011 3D leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on execution.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
Pro Evolution Soccer 2011 3D
Passing, shooting and dribbling controls demand timing
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on reads.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
Pro Evolution Soccer 2011 3D
Human opponents must be outguessed in real time
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
Pro Evolution Soccer 2011 3D
Deflections and physics add measured unpredictability
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
Pro Evolution Soccer 2011 3D
Formations and tactics reward strategic planning
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.