head to head
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
Refined Crash sequel with tighter movement and hidden gem-path routing.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
A punishing NES run-and-gun testing dodge execution over memorised enemy waves.
Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back
Slide-jump precision across varied hazards
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Dodging dense fire while managing floating aim is everything
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back
Scripted enemies and bosses
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Alien waves are identical every playthrough
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back
Fixed levels with hidden but static secrets
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Fixed spawns - nothing hidden after one run
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back
Gem paths and box routes converge
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Memorising stage layouts and satellite positioning enables clears
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back →
full breakdown
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team →