head to head
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A roguelite dungeon-crawler fused with a cult management sim.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A dwarven survival-crafting expedition where managing ore, gear and bases outweighs swordplay.
Cult of the Lamb leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Lord of the Rings: Return to Moria leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Cult of the Lamb
Roguelite combat needs decent dodges.
The Lord of the Rings: Return to Moria
Stamina-based melee needs modest timing and positioning.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Cult of the Lamb
Enemies are scripted, not adaptive.
The Lord of the Rings: Return to Moria
Orc hordes are scripted spawns, not adaptive minds.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Cult of the Lamb
Run rooms and tarot pulls randomize.
The Lord of the Rings: Return to Moria
Procedurally generated mines hide ore, dangers and routes.
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Cult of the Lamb
Cult management and build synergies dominate.
The Lord of the Rings: Return to Moria
Base building, gear tiers and resource chains decide survival.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.