Building comparison
head to head
CupheadvsDOOM (2016)
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
Cuphead
Execution · Pure Mechanics
A run-and-gun boss rush about dodging scripted patterns with tight inputs.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
Cuphead leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
CupheadDOOM (2016)
Axis by axis
Execution9 vs 8
Cuphead leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Cuphead
Tight dodging and parry timing decide every boss.
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
Reads0 vs 1
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Cuphead
Bosses cycle scripted phases; no adaptation to player.
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
Variance1 vs 1
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Cuphead
Minor attack-order shuffling between phases.
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
Optimization6 vs 5
Cuphead leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Cuphead
Loadouts and boss phase order are fully learnable.
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.