head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Capcom's survival horror where you manage scarce ammo while raptors hunt you through a research facility.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
The classic survival horror sequel where ammo budgeting and route knowledge tame Raccoon City.
Dino Crisis leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Resident Evil 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dino Crisis
Tank-control dodging of fast raptors punishes slow hands
Resident Evil 2
Tank controls and aim need competence, not mastery
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dino Crisis
Dinosaur AI is aggressive but fixed, never models you
Resident Evil 2
Zombies are scripted, never adaptive
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dino Crisis
Ambush placements and item locations are unknown first time
Resident Evil 2
First-run item and enemy placement is hidden information
Resident Evil 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Dino Crisis
Ammo economy, plug puzzles, and routing dominate survival
Resident Evil 2
Routing, ammo economy, and puzzles fully converge on replay
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.