Building comparison
head to head
Dodge 'EmvsSuper Mario Run
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.
Dodge 'Em
Execution · Pure Mechanics
A pure lane-timing reflex test against head-on collision cars.
Super Mario Run
Execution · Practiced Mastery
One-thumb tap-timing precision over fixed courses with solvable coin routes.
Dodge 'Em leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Super Mario Run leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Dodge 'EmSuper Mario Run
Axis by axis
Execution6 vs 6
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dodge 'Em
Lane-switch timing against closing cars is the whole game
Super Mario Run
One-handed tap timing for coin lines demands precision
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dodge 'Em
Computer cars chase head-on by simple fixed logic
Super Mario Run
Auto-runner with no adaptive opponent; Toad Rally is asynchronous
Variance2 vs 1
Dodge 'Em leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Dodge 'Em
Opposing car spawns vary slightly per loop
Super Mario Run
Courses are fixed and fully learnable
Optimization3 vs 4
Super Mario Run leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Dodge 'Em
Optimal lane patterns are quickly learnable
Super Mario Run
Routing perfect coin runs is a solvable layout puzzle
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.