head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
A vertical bullet-hell shooter testing precise dodging and scoring chains.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A stylish action game demanding sharp execution through layered combo and dodge timing while optimising chip builds around fixed enemy choreography.
DonPachi leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Nier: Automata leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
DonPachi leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
DonPachi
Precise dodging through dense bullet patterns defines play
Nier: Automata
Fast combos, dodge timing, and bullet-hell patterns demand precise inputs
Nier: Automata leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
DonPachi
Solo - enemies follow fixed bullet patterns
Nier: Automata
Enemies follow scripted patterns; no adaptive opponent
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
DonPachi
Patterns fixed once memorized, minimal randomness
Nier: Automata
Loot drops and chip rolls add minor randomness to builds
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
DonPachi
Chaining and weapon choice maximize score
Nier: Automata
Chip loadout, weapon choice, and attack routing reward systematic planning
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.