Building comparison
head to head
DOOM (2016)vsFinal Fight 3
DOOM (2016) asks more than Final Fight 3, and the gap is optimization.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
Final Fight 3
Execution · Pure Mechanics
A classic side-scrolling brawler focused on tight combat execution.
DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Final Fight 3 leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
DOOM (2016)Final Fight 3
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 7
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
Final Fight 3
beat-em-up combo and dodge execution
Reads1 vs 0
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
Final Fight 3
enemies use fixed scripted aggression
Variance1 vs 1
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
Final Fight 3
minor enemy spawn randomness
Optimization5 vs 3
DOOM (2016) leans clearly harder on optimization.
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
Final Fight 3
character choice and combo-route optimization
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.