head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
A classic side-scrolling brawler focused on tight combat execution.

Execution · Pure Mechanics
Landmark FPS built on physics puzzles and tight gunplay.
Final Fight 3 leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Half-Life 2 leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
Final Fight 3 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Final Fight 3
beat-em-up combo and dodge execution
Half-Life 2
Gravity gun and shooting demand precision.
Half-Life 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Final Fight 3
enemies use fixed scripted aggression
Half-Life 2
Combine AI scripted, non-adaptive.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fight 3
minor enemy spawn randomness
Half-Life 2
Almost no randomness.
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fight 3
character choice and combo-route optimization
Half-Life 2
Linear progression with no builds.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.