Building comparison
head to head
DOOM (2016)vsKinect Adventures
DOOM (2016) asks more than Kinect Adventures, and the gap is optimization.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
Kinect Adventures
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Flailing accurately at motion-tracked minigames, nothing deeper.
DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Kinect Adventures leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
DOOM (2016)Kinect Adventures
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 5
DOOM (2016) leans clearly harder on execution.
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
Kinect Adventures
Full-body motion timing is the only test present
Reads1 vs 0
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
Kinect Adventures
No adaptive opposition in minigames
Variance1 vs 1
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
Kinect Adventures
Obstacle sequences barely vary
Optimization5 vs 1
DOOM (2016) leans clearly harder on optimization.
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
Kinect Adventures
Minigames are too simple to optimise meaningfully
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.