Building comparison
head to head
DOOM (2016)vsTurbo Pug DX
Neither is simply harder - they are hard in different places. DOOM (2016) demands more optimization; Turbo Pug DX demands more variance.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
Turbo Pug DX
Execution · Pure Mechanics
An endless runner testing quick reflexes against procedurally generated obstacles.
DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Turbo Pug DX leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
DOOM (2016)Turbo Pug DX
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 6
DOOM (2016) leans clearly harder on execution.
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
Turbo Pug DX
reflex timing for jumps and dodges
Reads1 vs 0
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
Turbo Pug DX
no opponent, endless runner obstacles
Variance1 vs 3
Turbo Pug DX leans clearly harder on variance.
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
Turbo Pug DX
procedurally generated obstacle patterns
Optimization5 vs 2
DOOM (2016) leans clearly harder on optimization.
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
Turbo Pug DX
minimal systems beyond survival length
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.