Building comparison
head to head
Endless LegendvsTotal Extreme Wrestling 2013
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.
Endless Legend
Optimization · Pure Optimization
Fantasy 4X with strong asymmetric factions and quest paths.
Total Extreme Wrestling 2013
Optimization · Pure Optimization
A wrestling-promotion management sim testing booking, finance, and roster strategy.
Endless Legend leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Total Extreme Wrestling 2013 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Endless LegendTotal Extreme Wrestling 2013
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 1
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Endless Legend
turn-based
Total Extreme Wrestling 2013
Menu management, no physical input
Reads3 vs 3
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Endless Legend
scripted AI, limited MP
Total Extreme Wrestling 2013
Rival promotions react via simulation, not modeling you directly
Variance4 vs 4
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Endless Legend
quest and tech rolls
Total Extreme Wrestling 2013
Match ratings and pop swings carry simulation randomness
Optimization8 vs 9
Total Extreme Wrestling 2013 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Endless Legend
faction-specific yield optimization
Total Extreme Wrestling 2013
Booking, finances and roster strategy define success
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.