Building comparison
head to head
FactoriovsRollerCoaster Tycoon 2
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.
Factorio
Optimization · Pure Optimization
A factory-engineering sandbox about scaling throughput against your own bottlenecks.
RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
Optimization · Pure Optimization
A park management puzzle where understanding the guest happiness formula lets you solve each scenario optimally.
Factorio leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); RollerCoaster Tycoon 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
FactorioRollerCoaster Tycoon 2
Axis by axis
Execution2 vs 2
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Factorio
Some APM in early hand-crafting; otherwise irrelevant.
RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
Track building is grid-based with modest placement precision demands
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Factorio
Biters follow fixed pollution rules; no adaptive opponent.
RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
Guest behaviour follows fixed preference scripts
Variance1 vs 2
RollerCoaster Tycoon 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Factorio
Resource patch placement adds minor map randomness.
RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
Very little randomness once ride stats are understood
Optimization10 vs 9
Factorio leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Factorio
Throughput, ratios, and logistics are the entire game.
RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
Pricing, ride stats, and park layout are near-perfectly solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.