Building comparison
head to head
FalloutvsSD Gundam G Generation Cross Rays
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
Fallout
Optimization · Pure Optimization
The original post-apocalyptic CRPG where character builds solve the wasteland.
SD Gundam G Generation Cross Rays
Optimization · Pure Optimization
Optimizing mecha squad builds and development plans through solvable tactical stages.
Fallout leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); SD Gundam G Generation Cross Rays leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
FalloutSD Gundam G Generation Cross Rays
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 0
Fallout leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Fallout
Turn-based, no dexterity
SD Gundam G Generation Cross Rays
Turn-based menus - hands are irrelevant
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fallout
No adaptive opposition
SD Gundam G Generation Cross Rays
Enemy AI follows fixed priorities, never models you
Variance4 vs 3
Fallout leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Fallout
To-hit rolls and random encounters
SD Gundam G Generation Cross Rays
Hit rolls and crits wobble individual turns slightly
Optimization8 vs 8
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fallout
SPECIAL builds and quest routing are deeply solvable
SD Gundam G Generation Cross Rays
Squad building, unit development and stage routing is the game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.