head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A breezy grid-based tactics RPG about building a clan through hundreds of jobs, laws, and missions.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Hoenn's definitive version, crowned by the strategy-heavy Battle Frontier.
Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Pokémon Emerald leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift
Fully turn-based; zero physical demand.
Pokémon Emerald
Turn-based commands only
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift
Enemy AI is predictable and non-adaptive.
Pokémon Emerald
Battle Frontier AI is fixed-policy
Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift
Hit rolls, law cards, and loot add modest randomness.
Pokémon Emerald
Encounter RNG and Frontier hax
Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift
Job combos, positioning, and clan builds decide everything.
Pokémon Emerald
EVs, movesets, and Frontier strategy run deep
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.