head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A deep optimization puzzle solved through job combinations and CT-manipulation on fixed maps.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A deep 3.5E optimization puzzle where prestige class chaining and feat synergies determine party effectiveness.
Final Fantasy Tactics leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Neverwinter Nights 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy Tactics
No twitch; CT-tick positioning demands spatial planning only
Neverwinter Nights 2
Tactical pause negates twitch; positioning is deliberate not reactive
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy Tactics
CPU job/action selection is fixed and fully predictable
Neverwinter Nights 2
Companion AI and enemy scripting are fixed, non-adaptive routines
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy Tactics
Random drops and some proc rates exist but rarely swing outcomes
Neverwinter Nights 2
Hidden enemy stat blocks and variable dungeon RNG create unknowns
Final Fantasy Tactics leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Final Fantasy Tactics
Job mastery, ability stacking, and CT manipulation are near-perfectly solvable
Neverwinter Nights 2
3.5E feat synergies and prestige class planning define optimal builds
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.