head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A squad shooter about leading a resistance through occupied New York, balancing gunplay with simple squad orders.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
An open-world co-op shooter about scouting cartel bases and picking the cleanest approach.
Freedom Fighters leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Freedom Fighters
Third-person gunplay and squad command under fire
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Headshots, drone marking, and sync shots reward steady aim
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Freedom Fighters
Soviet AI is scripted, not adaptive
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Enemy AI is scripted patrol logic, not adaptive
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Freedom Fighters
Minor encounter variation
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Patrol spawns and reinforcements add mild unpredictability
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Freedom Fighters
Charisma economy and mission order across the map
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Outpost approach planning and skill unlocks carry progression
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.