head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Sequel RPG where scarce learning points make build planning brutally consequential.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
The classic survival horror sequel where ammo budgeting and route knowledge tame Raccoon City.
Gothic II leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Resident Evil 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gothic II
Directional melee timing against tough fauna
Resident Evil 2
Tank controls and aim need competence, not mastery
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gothic II
No adaptive opposition
Resident Evil 2
Zombies are scripted, never adaptive
Resident Evil 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Gothic II
First-run surprises until the island is mapped
Resident Evil 2
First-run item and enemy placement is hidden information
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gothic II
Strict learning-point economy rewards ruthless planning
Resident Evil 2
Routing, ammo economy, and puzzles fully converge on replay
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.