head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Fighting and building at insect scale by learning fixed creature patterns and optimising gear choices.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Open-world action game where procedurally generated orc captains remember your encounters.
Grounded leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grounded
Bug combat demands precise dodge timing and weapon choice
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Counter-timing combat and stealth execution
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Grounded
Insect AI is scripted; no adaptive opponent
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Nemesis orcs remember you but remain mappable scripts
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grounded
Creature spawn and loot drops carry session-level randomness
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Procedural captains with hidden strengths and weaknesses
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grounded
Base placement, gear progression, and creature weaknesses are solvable
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Intel gathering and exploiting known weaknesses solves fights
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.