head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A turn-based RPG where relic substat variance and speed-tuned team optimisation define endgame performance.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A soccer management sim about optimizing squad, finances and tactics over a career.
Honkai: Star Rail leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); New Star Manager leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Honkai: Star Rail
Turn-based; physical input precision is essentially irrelevant
New Star Manager
Menu and tap input, no physical performance demand
New Star Manager leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Honkai: Star Rail
PvE only with scripted enemy behaviour throughout
New Star Manager
AI opponents follow systems, not adaptive mind-modelling
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Honkai: Star Rail
Relic substat RNG and gacha pulls drive character progression
New Star Manager
Match outcomes and events carry meaningful randomness
Honkai: Star Rail leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Honkai: Star Rail
Speed tuning, team cycle theory, and buff windows are deeply solvable
New Star Manager
Squad building, training and tactics are the solvable core
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.